What is a suggested response to a detector that does not function correctly during a test?

Replacing a malfunctioning detector and escalating the issue is the appropriate response when a detector does not function correctly during testing. Fire detection systems are critical for the safety and operation of a power plant; therefore, ensuring that every detector operates correctly is paramount. If a detector fails a test, it indicates a potential risk of undetected fires, which could lead to catastrophic consequences.

Replacing the faulty unit ensures that the detection system remains reliable and effective. Escalating the issue is also vital, as it allows for further investigation into why the detector failed. This could involve checking for underlying issues in the fire detection system, maintenance protocols, or even the quality of the detector itself. Taking these proactive steps not only adheres to safety standards but also helps in maintaining the overall integrity of the fire detection system in the power plant.

The other options suggest responses that do not adequately address the seriousness of the situation. Adjusting sensitivity settings could lead to further complications or may not resolve the underlying problem. Continuing to test other detectors without resolving the current issue could result in an oversight that compromises safety. Ignoring the failure undermines the integrity of the entire fire detection system, endangering personnel and operations. Thus, the response to a non-functioning detector must be one that